1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn vs. 1996 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 840 kg more than 1996 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | 1996 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volkswagen |
Model | Silver Dawn | Polo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4566 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2410 mm |