1954 Rover P4 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,230 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1954 Rover P4. (80 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1954 Rover P4.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Rover P4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Rover P4. (153 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Rover P4 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | P4 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2230 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 45 L |
