1954 Rover P4 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1954 Rover P4. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1954 Rover P4.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Rover P4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Rover P4. (138 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Rover P4 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Rover | Mazda |
| Model | P4 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3010 mm |
