1954 Saab 92B vs. 1967 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1967 ZAZ 966 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 92B would be higher. At 886 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Saab 92B weights approximately 45 kg more than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Because 1967 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Saab 92B | 1967 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Saab | ZAZ |
Model | 92B | 966 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 764 cc | 886 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2170 mm |