1954 Simca Aronde vs. 2010 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2010 Mercury Mariner is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 714 kg more than 1954 Simca Aronde.
Because 1954 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Simca Aronde | 2010 Mercury Mariner | |
| Make | Simca | Mercury |
| Model | Aronde | Mariner |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1664 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1806 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2619 mm |
