1954 Singer Hunter vs. 2010 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2010 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter.
Because 1954 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Buick LaCrosse has automatic transmission and 1954 Singer Hunter has manual transmission. 1954 Singer Hunter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Buick LaCrosse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Singer Hunter | 2010 Buick LaCrosse | |
| Make | Singer | Buick |
| Model | Hunter | LaCrosse |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5001 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2837 mm |
