1954 Singer Hunter vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Juke weights approximately 202 kg more than 1954 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Singer Hunter | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Singer | Nissan |
Model | Hunter | Juke |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1342 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2530 mm |