1954 Singer Hunter vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 410 kg more than 1954 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Singer Hunter | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Singer | Mitsubishi |
Model | Hunter | Colt |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2500 mm |