1954 Studebaker Commander vs. 2012 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2012 Hyundai i20 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Studebaker Commander (140 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Studebaker Commander should accelerate faster than 2012 Hyundai i20.
Because 1954 Studebaker Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Studebaker Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Hyundai i20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Studebaker Commander | 2012 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Studebaker | Hyundai |
Model | Commander | i20 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3673 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 17:01 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2525 mm |