1954 Talbot T 26 vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Talbot T 26 (198 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 89 kg more than 2010 Nissan Rogue. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Talbot T 26 | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Talbot | Nissan |
Model | T 26 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 4482 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1521 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1801 mm |