1954 Toyota Super vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Toyota Super would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (250 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1954 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1954 Toyota Super.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Toyota Super | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Toyota | Dodge |
| Model | Super | Charger |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1451 cc | 3500 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 250 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
