1954 Toyota Super vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Toyota Super would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (141 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1954 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1954 Toyota Super.
Because 1954 Toyota Super is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Toyota Super. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Toyota Super | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Toyota | Kia |
Model | Super | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1451 cc | 1975 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |