1954 Toyota Super vs. 2012 Kia Forte
To start off, 2012 Kia Forte is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Toyota Super would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Forte (156 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1954 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1954 Toyota Super.
Because 1954 Toyota Super is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Toyota Super. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Toyota Super | 2012 Kia Forte | |
Make | Toyota | Kia |
Model | Super | Forte |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1451 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |