1954 Toyota Super vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Toyota Super would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1954 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1954 Toyota Super.
Because 1954 Toyota Super is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Toyota Super. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Toyota Super | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Toyota | Kia |
Model | Super | RIO |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1451 cc | 1600 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |