1954 Triumph 10 Break vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (153 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1954 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Triumph 10 Break | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Triumph | Mazda |
| Model | 10 Break | 6 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1435 kg |
