1955 Abarth 207 vs. 1951 Allard K1
To start off, 1955 Abarth 207 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Allard K1 (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 207. (78 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Allard K1 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 207. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K1 weights approximately 197 kg more than 1955 Abarth 207. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 1951 Allard K1 | |
Make | Abarth | Allard |
Model | 207 | K1 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 113 L |