1955 Abarth 207 vs. 1962 Austin A 40
To start off, 1962 Austin A 40 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Abarth 207 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 207 (78 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 207 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Abarth 207 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 1962 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 207 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |