1955 Abarth 207 vs. 1964 Austin A 60
To start off, 1964 Austin A 60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 207 (78 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 207 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 60 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1955 Abarth 207.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 207 | 1964 Austin A 60 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | 207 | A 60 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 34 L |
