1955 Abarth 207 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 654 kg more than 1955 Abarth 207.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 207 | 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 207 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 257 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1524 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 57 L |
