1955 Abarth 207 vs. 1998 Ford Puma
To start off, 1998 Ford Puma is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 207. (78 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 207. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Puma weights approximately 140 kg more than 1955 Abarth 207. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 207 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 207. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 1998 Ford Puma | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 207 | Puma |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 42 L |