1955 Abarth 207 vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 207 (78 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 207 should accelerate faster than 2000 Plymouth Neon.
Because 1955 Abarth 207 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 207. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | Abarth | Plymouth |
Model | 207 | Neon |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |