1955 Abarth 207 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 242 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 207. (78 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 207. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 630 kg more than 1955 Abarth 207. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 207 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 320 HP |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 252 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 57 L |