1955 Abarth 207 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 207. (78 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 207. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1955 Abarth 207. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 2003 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 207 | Astro |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 4292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 117 L |