1955 Abarth 207 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 207 (78 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 207 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1955 Abarth 207 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 207. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 207 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2490 mm |