1955 Abarth 207 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 207 (78 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 207 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1955 Abarth 207 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 207. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 207 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |