1955 Abarth 207 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 207. (78 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 207.
Because 1955 Abarth 207 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 207. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Abarth | Volkswagen |
Model | 207 | Polo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |