1955 Abarth 207 vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 207 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 207. (78 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 207. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 226 kg more than 1955 Abarth 207. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 207 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 207. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 207 | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | 207 | RIO |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1096 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 43 L |