1955 Abarth 208 vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 208. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 208 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 208. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 208. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 295 kg more than 1955 Abarth 208. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 208 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 208. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 208 | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
| Make | Abarth | Plymouth |
| Model | 208 | Caravelle |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1088 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |
