1955 Abarth 208 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 208. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 208 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (191 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 208. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 208. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 720 kg more than 1955 Abarth 208. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 208 | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 208 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1088 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2570 mm |