1955 Abarth 208 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 208. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 208 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 208. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 208. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1955 Abarth 208. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 208. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 208 | 2002 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 208 | Astro |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1088 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 2080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 102 L |