1955 Abarth 208 vs. 2003 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 2003 Pontiac GTO is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 208. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 208 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pontiac GTO (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 208. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 208. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 820 kg more than 1955 Abarth 208. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 208 | 2003 Pontiac GTO | |
Make | Abarth | Pontiac |
Model | 208 | GTO |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1088 cc | 5664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |