1955 Abarth 208 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Volt
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Volt is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 208. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 208 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Volt weights approximately 845 kg more than 1955 Abarth 208.
Because 1955 Abarth 208 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 208. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Volt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 208 | 2012 Chevrolet Volt | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 208 | Volt |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 35 L |
