1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1951 Austin A 110
To start off, 1955 Abarth 209 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Austin A 110 (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 110 weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1951 Austin A 110 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 209 | A 110 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 34 L |