1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1952 Austin A 70
To start off, 1955 Abarth 209 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 70 (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1952 Austin A 70 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | 209 | A 70 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 56 L |
