1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1955 Abarth 209 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 685 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 209 | XK |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 106 mm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 63 L |
