1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1960 Abarth 2200
To start off, 1960 Abarth 2200 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1960 Abarth 2200 | |
| Make | Abarth | Abarth |
| Model | 209 | 2200 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 2160 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 27 L |
