1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1960 Peugeot 203
To start off, 1960 Peugeot 203 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Peugeot 203 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 209 (65 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1960 Peugeot 203. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 209 should accelerate faster than 1960 Peugeot 203. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Peugeot 203 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1960 Peugeot 203 | |
Make | Abarth | Peugeot |
Model | 209 | 203 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 44 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |