1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1963 AC Cobra
To start off, 1963 AC Cobra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Cobra weights approximately 440 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1963 AC Cobra | |
Make | Abarth | AC |
Model | 209 | Cobra |
Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 68 L |