1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1963 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1963 Mazda R 360 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,087 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Abarth 209 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 209 (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 209 should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Abarth 209 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1963 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1963 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 209 | R 360 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 63 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 55 L |