1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1964 Triumph 2000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Abarth | Triumph |
| Model | 209 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 64 L |
