1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1964 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1964 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,147 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Triumph Spitfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 209 (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 209 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph Spitfire weights approximately 95 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1964 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Abarth | Triumph |
| Model | 209 | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 40 L |
