1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1974 Lotus Eclat is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 370 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | 209 | Eclat |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 95.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 67 L |
