1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1976 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1976 Triumph Stag is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Triumph Stag weights approximately 600 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1976 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Abarth | Triumph |
| Model | 209 | Stag |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 63 L |
