1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 209 (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 209 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 209 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 209 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | 209 | 66 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
