1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1978 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 482 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1978 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 209 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 65 L |
