1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1978 Toyota Celica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Celica (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Celica weights approximately 385 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 209 | Celica |
Year Released | 1955 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |