1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1982 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Ritmo (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 310 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1982 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | 209 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1955 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 71.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 57 L |