1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega

To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 520 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 209 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 209 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: