1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1983 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1983 Zastava 2101 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,196 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 2101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth 209 (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth 209 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 209 | 1983 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Abarth | Zastava |
| Model | 209 | 2101 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2430 mm |
