1955 Abarth 209 vs. 1986 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1986 Mercury Lynx is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 209. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 209 would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mercury Lynx (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 209. (65 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Lynx should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 209. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 415 kg more than 1955 Abarth 209. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 209 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 209. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 209 | 1986 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Abarth | Mercury |
Model | 209 | Lynx |
Year Released | 1955 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1087 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2400 mm |